Latest News and Reviews

Las Vegas Foreclosed Homes - A Popular Target For Bargain Hunters

More and more bargain hunters are buying up foreclosed homes in Las Vegas, at a faster rate than in other parts of the United States. US statistics for foreclosed homes indicate that there were over 1 million foreclosure properties recorded in 2008 and Las Vegas continues to record the highest metro foreclosure rate.

In April 2009, 14,073 foreclosure fillings were reported in Las Vegas. Although the figure shows 20% decrease compare to previous month, the city continues to post the highest foreclosure rate among metro areas. It is estimated that 1 in every 56 house in the city received a foreclosure filling in April, which in nearly 7 time the country average.

Las Vegas-based Sales Traq reports that about 2/3 of the sale of local home in March 2009 were for properties owned by banks. These include 2,376 dispositions and 1,846 acquisitions, leaving the number of property still owned by banks totalling 15,954 in March.

There are signs of banks becoming more streetwise as far as REO pricing is concerned.  Below-market value foreclosures are listed to encourage competitive bidding, which results in more offers and a better pricing. The average price of a foreclosure sale in March was $127,500, whereas the same figure for homes not owned by bank was $149,900.

Fifty percent of the country largest banks do not pass the government’s Supervisory Capital Assessment Program - acting as a “stress test”. The president of the investment service Foreclosures.com, Alexis McGee, said that banks will use their available foreclosure inventory to obtain capital. Pricing the homes right can result in incredible deals for consumers on properties owned by banks. McGee added that given the current economic situation in the US, now it the perfect time for buyers to pressure the banks to sell their REO inventory.

Las Vegas REO listings had been on the decline since February, in the wake of certain foreclosure moratoriums enacted by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other major lenders in the country. There was a 5% drop in the beginning week of May compare to the last week of April. This was the first time the number of short sale (10,305) was greater than the number of REO listings (10,281).

With the lifting of the foreclosure moratorium, the nation is on the verge of experiencing a record-breaking number of foreclosures. The so-called “sand states” which include Florida, Nevada, California and Arizona are at the top of the list for foreclosure ratings.

New Short Sales Incentive To Help Lenders And Homeowners Avoid Costly Foreclosure

Obama Administration has recently announced a fresh incentive program for banks under the Making Home Affordable plan to help troubled homeowners to sell houses that are worth less than their mortgages. The move come as a big relief for those who urgently required to get the short sale approved.

Short sales is estimated to accounted for 15% - 20% of the total home sales this year. According to a study short sales resulted in loan losses of only 19%, compared with an average loss of 40% in foreclosure. Short sales are often preferable to a foreclosure but the process needs lender approval and may takes 3-4 months to complete.

Through the initiative of Making Home Affordable program, banks would get $1000 incentive in dealing with short sale or deed in lieu of foreclosure properties, said Timothy Geithner, Treasury Secretary. For homeowners who are going to lose their home, this program will fetch even bigger amount of $1500 as expenses for relocation.

Geithner commented that this program is to assist homeowners in obtaining possible modifications in those areas where there is a decline in the real estate prices. If there is no possibility of modifications, then there are efforts on the part of government to promote private sale or transfer of property so that homeowners can save as well secure their financial status in future.

The above efforts are made by government in order to stabilize the economy through reviving real estate market and specifically foreclosures industry. A short sale deals with selling of homes at lesser price than market value of mortgage by banks in order to get away with the high cost associated with foreclosure process which is almost $50,000.

While the deed in lieu of foreclosure deals with signing of property owner on the deed and consent to give up the house. In this case, banks or the lending institutions can save $50,000 for not going for foreclosure process.

It doesn’t matter which option are you going for, but it is highly advisable to have an attorney so that your all rights are protected. An attorney can help you out in improving your credit score by negotiating credit report agreement.

Refinancing Your Existing Home Mortgage May Save You Hundreds Of Dollars Per Month

With a tougher economic patch prevalent in the society, more and more people are looking to curb expenses. Thankfully, mortgage rates are at enviable lows. If you are looking at 30-year mortgages, you might fetch a figure of 5 percent that can further spiral if you make a meticulous examination. The prevalent rates are unprecedented low since Freddie Mac began rate tracking roughly 4 decades ago. You will have a broadened smile if you go for a 15-year mortgage- anything in the vicinity of 4.5 percent is procurable. Only a year ago, while euphoria was still on, 30-year mortgage rate was close to 6 percent and 15-year mortgage was proximal to 5.6 percent.

So, what’s the deal you get on refinancing? Lets have an illustration: if you have a $400,000 mortgage refinanced down to 4.875% from 6%, then your saving per month would be around $300. Also, look carefully to avoid closing costs. If you have serial refinancing on mind and the closing costs may put you on a short fuse, then you can go for a “no/no” loan where you don’t have to face closing costs at all. Yes, these might bring up a higher mortgage interest rate but its well worth it if you are planning to move in 3 to 5 years.

The rates we discuss here are for conforming loans. Such loans are defined as being less than $ 417,000 unless you reside in posh areas. Rates are higher for jumbo mortgages and for them to materialize; you would still require a 20 percent home equity (unencumbered interests of a homeowner) in your home. Also, you might have to fork out a little extra if you are paying off a Home Equity Line for partly financing your refinance. It is because many lenders consider such loans to be “Cash-Outs”.

Senate Draws Closer To Pass Credit Card Bill Of Rights

Consumers stunned by the sudden sharp increase in the interest rate on their credit cards might get new strong protection through such revelations under legislation, which seems headed for the Senate passage soon this week.

On Tuesday, the passage of bill became smoother with lawmakers agreed on a measure that require credit card companies to provide 45 days notice before increase in fee charge and interest rate can take effect, besides the promotional rates must stay for 6 months.

Bill by the Senate is about the same as compare to the bill, which the House passed. A key section of the Senate which helped to bring about the negotiation bill debated recently, would allow credit card lenders from levying retroactive rate raises only when any consumer was behind in payment over 60 days. After 6 months, if a consumer paid minimum balance punctually, then that would result in fresh imposition of lower rate.

Last month, the House of Representatives passed its “Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights”. The legislation concerns numerous officials from the banking industry. On Tuesday, senators received a letter from The American Bankers Association, which said while it realized the necessity of consumer protection, the measure also includes a number of provisions which restrict the ability of a lender to deal with risk, price fees and conduct business prudently. Those restrictions will reduce credit available to consumers - given present economic conditions on hand, other than raising the credit price where it stays available.

However, the bankers are against political impetus, which comes after few consumer groups and lawmakers have pressed for amendments for over a decade. Three developments recently have introduced a change in legislative mood. First is the president, second is the economy condition and thirdly, many households have suffered due to abusive increase of interest rates by credit card issuers.

A 2008 survey of 12 giant credit card lenders found 93% cards allowing issuers to increase an interest rate at any time through altering account agreement. The survey said that about 87% cards permitted issuers to levy automatic increases of penalty interest rates on all the balances, whether or not the account is past due by 30 days.

President Obama Student Loan Reform Plan

President of the USA Barack Obama recently put forth his plan to remove banks from providing students loans to the federally assured students. This move according to the President is aimed at supporting the interests or financial aid provided to millions of students all over America.

The president while addressing at the White House added that this move although facing opposition from some members of the congress would definitely help in saving billions of dollars. This money according to the White House sources and the budget makers is more than sufficient to cover 95% of cost increase resulting from the president’s plan to increase student’s Pell Grants. According to President Obama the current loan providing system is wasting a lot of money due to the subsidies of billions of dollars to lenders and this sum could be used directly to make college expenses more economical and affordable.

The members opposing the plan are putting forward their point that making the federal government accountable for the centrally provided loans would certainly cause incompetence due to increasing role of government. President Obama however said that the increase in the cost of college education and fees have outperformed and displaced the average income group in USA, this program could be the first step to bridge the gap and thus make education in the country more affordable.

The government on their part has increased Pell grants provided to students and provided tax credits for universities and colleges in order to assist the universities and colleges graduate more students.

President Obama thus concluded that this step from his government was aimed at making college education more affordable and economical to students. Thus those opposing the program should think again whether they want to waste billions of tax payer money to banks or use the money to boon 8.5 millions of students across the country.