-
New Income Based Repayment Program To Help College Graduates Repay Student Loans
Posted on June 1st, 2009 More Than 14 DaysOn an average, $22,000 of student loan debt rides on the shoulder of a college graduate. As an aside, the job market is getting increasingly dubious. For them, this quandary is a time to learn that a degree is not always self-supportive. If you have graduated recently and are finding it difficult to repay your dues then perhaps brighter tomorrow is ahead. Come 1st of July and a fresh Income-Based Repayment program will minimize the loan overdue of college graduates. Those who are high on debts and pretty low with job emoluments would benefit most. If your debts exceed your annual income then qualifying would cease to be an issue.
Income Criteria : The program mulls over income earned above 150 percent of the stipulated Federal Poverty Level. For those who are single in continental US, the very same amount happens to be $16,245. Of this stipulated amount, less than 15 percent shall go towards student loans. If your income is less than 150 percent level of federal poverty then you are deemed to have no discretionary income as such and your overall payment would be tantamount to zero. For those who earn more, payment would be adjudged via a sliding scale. There would be cases where the payment would fall short of covering the loan interest, in such an event, the unpaid interest would accrue but wont accumulate as in the case of conventional programs pertaining to deferrals.
What You Need To Do : Applications will be there for the taking from July 1. The IRS will get a detailed script on your previous year’s income. In case you have more than one fixed rate loans charging some 6.8 percent then you might chose to consolidate them. In the case of variable interest loans taken prior to 2006, such loans would help you qualify for a lower interest rate in July when seen under the light of consolidation interest rate put forth by treasury auctions. For those who have lost their job and are not able to pay their previously consolidate loan, they might also qualify for the program base on their current income.
One shall be eligible for the Income-Based Repayment program even if he or she falls behind on the student loans. For those who have filed a bankruptcy protection, this program might be the best way to clear their loans since bankruptcy will not erase student loans.
The program has been brought up tentatively as of now but it has very best intentions to alleviate the misery of those trapped in exorbitant student loans and thus boost up public service. If everything going as planned, it is hope that education will help more people securing better jobs and eventually help them repay their loan easier.
-
Student Loans - Beware Of The Fine Print
Posted on May 27th, 2009 More Than 14 DaysLast month was the time when high school seniors looked forward to receive fat postages from their colleges of choice. Today, it is a very different story, as they are posed with the question of how to eventually pay for all of this. Many will end up looking to take out a private student loan, along with all the fine print and financial fog that go with it.
Project on Student Debt indicates that the typical graduate leaves University or College with an average student loan debt of $21,900. And these loans can never be dispelled through filing an application for individual’s bankruptcy.
Among the several federal lending schemes that exist, the private-student-loan market constitutes less than one third of the total size; it is estimated at approx $20 billion. But, as a result of declining in the value of real estate and fall in stock market, there is an adverse effect on two alternatives of tuition funding sources (529 plans as well as home equity balances), it is expected that students will have to rely more on banks or any other private financial institutions this year.
Tim Ranzetta, who founded the company Student Lending Analytics, responsible for helping universities analyze lending programs, has described the market as a very opaque one, claiming that established lenders are seeking to win on company’s brand image rather than on price.
As part of a study with the objective of assessing the several offerings, Ranzetta has applied for education loans from several biggest and most well-established lending bodies. A key part of it all was to review the attached disclosures during the application and after the process, as well as to go through the promissory notes provided by the lenders.
He was surprised to find out that the interest rates range for fixed-rate loans varied from 7% to 12%, as well as the observation that the higher interest rates are usually charged by bigger lenders. Looking at the fine print within the promissory notes led him to discover that a few lenders Chase, SunTrust Bank and PNC Financial were given to raise the interest rates by 2 to 3 percentage points were a borrower to be late with satisfying a single due payment.
Besides that, it is also notable that there were differences in the way lenders applied excess payments by borrowers. The policy adopted by most of the lending bodies was to apply whatever extra amount received to any late fees at first go, then to the rate of interest accrued, then finally to the principal amount. Sallie Mae, for its several private loans, attributed excess capital only to its future payments; this made it even tougher for a borrower to repay principal sooner. A representative for Sallie Mae clarified that students making special requests would have their excess payments applied to their principal amount.
-
Obama Signed Credit Card Reform Bill Into Law
Posted on May 25th, 2009 More Than 14 DaysPresident Obama sanctioned the most significant changes to the America’s credit card industry in last 40 years when he on last Friday mandated an act to limit practices which, according to him, contributed to financial problems faced by consumers during this recession. He described it as a matter of establishing common sense reforms whose aims were to protect consumers. He made it clear that the White House expected consumers not to spend more than they earned, and to pay what they owed; but he also called for lender to perform with the same spirit of responsibility to which the American people aspired in their own way of living.
The new law includes a few restrictions on increase in interest rates and the amount of credit which may be offered to students in college. It will impact the banking industry but it will not be all positive for consumers either as it does not cap interest rates or fees. Robert McKinley, the founder of CardTrak.com, whose job is to negotiate with banks, has welcomed the law with open arms.
The expressed views of Marcia Sullivan, who is the Director of Government Relations for the trade group the Consumer Bankers Association, include that banks will be left with the foremost concern of how much availability there will be and what the price of credit will be, as a result of the new restrictions. She believes that every single player offering credit cards to customers will be reassessing their cost. She says that issuers will start reconsidering what they actually do and how are they going to do it in future.
The restrictions that the new law calls for, will, for the most part, take nine months to create any impact; and they will deal with a number of controversial practices such interest rate increases, penalty fees and marketing to those studying at University or College.
As far as interest rate increases are concerned, issuers will generally be allowed to increase rates only on current credit card debt if a given consumer’s bill is above 60 days overdue. Furthermore, banks will not be allowed to sanction late fees should they have delayed the credit of payments. Also, those under 21 may not be awarded a credit card from a bank unless that bank has verified that they have the means to pay, or unless parental permission has been granted.
Banks have already claimed that the higher costs, together with surging defaults and loan delinquencies, have made it a necessity for them to somehow reassess the credit card risk. But the banks’ actions have already made it a bigger challenge for consumers to make ends meet.
-
Student Loan Reform Benefits Taxpayers But Makes Banks Worry
Posted on May 22nd, 2009 More Than 14 DaysThe figures released by the Department of Education in April showed that 67% undergraduates in the 2007-2008 school year had received some financial aid with an average value of $9,100 in the form of loans, grants and work-study aid.
Even though the expensive higher education fees will not likely to change very soon, the Obama administration’s proposal which eliminates incentive to private lenders who offer student loans will dramatically change the way how the loans operate.
The plan already headed for passage on Capitol Hill, if approved, taxpayers would be the biggest winners. The Congressional Budget Office said that taxpayers would surely to have almost $100 billion of saving over the next ten years and lower-income students would also have the chance to receive more student aid in the form of grants. The big losers on the other hand would be private lenders and banks.
Right now, private lenders are lending money to students using the rates set by the Congress, and the government is guaranteeing 97% of the loan’s value, which give the private lenders huge profits at a minimal risk according to program critics.
Saving from the plan will be used to award more Pell Grants to low-income students. Student groups are overjoyed with the news. According to Angela from the United States Students Association, students want to graduate with manageable debt, but the current system does not allow them to do so, but the President has realized a better way to have a better loan policy.
Banks are strongly on the opposition saying that choice and innovation in the marketplace will be removed in a government-run loan program. According to Sallie Mae, the largest student lender in the world, the essentials of Obama’s proposal are already around for more than a decade but powerful lobbyist have so far manage to protect the lenders interest. However, this time around, the largest lender have changed course and compromised the Obama administration.
According to Sallie Mae’s spokesperson Martha Holler, their goal is to help make education affordable and they want to make sure that students have the money that they need for college. With the current proposal of the administration, the government will own the loans but Sallie Mae still get the job of originating and processing the loan through a free-for-service contract award by the government.
-
Senate Clears Credit Card Reform
Posted on May 21st, 2009 More Than 14 DaysSenate has passed a reform that would minimize the powers bestowed to the credit card industry. However, an amendment meant for easing Gun Laws in national parks is causing procrastination in its passage. The measure so-called “Credit Card Bill of Rights” has succeeded through an unequivocal 90-5 votes and aims at curtailing the powers vested to the credit card companies to enhance interest rates and levy penalties. A similar version of the bill easily passed the House just a few weeks ago by 357-70 votes. President Barrack Obama has urged congress to send the bill to him before end of this week.
Gun Law compromise with the house has been deferred owing to complexities in the gun rights provision. The amendment’s objective is to permit visitors to carry firearms in the national parks. This measure has however disagreed by the liberals and gun-control activists.
The Senate credit-card bill would abolish credit-card companies from further enhancing rate of interest on unpaid balance. An exception would be when the cardholder fall some 60 days behind the payment schedule. Any interest rate enhancements will be liable to be reviewed at intervals and would be minimized in the event of finding them to be unfair.
Credit card companies would have to inform their card users 45 days prior to any increase in interest rates. The same will be true for finance charges and extra fees. All credit card statements must be mailed 21 days before it is due. The new measures also prevent credit card issuers from double-cycle billing and make it harder for those below 21 years of age to apply for a credit card.

Home