Latest News and Reviews

A leading health, finance and technology news & reviews hub.
RSS icon
  • President Obama’s Student Loan Plan May End Up Saving Less

    Posted on August 6th, 2009 Editor More Than 14 Days

    President Obama’s student loan plan regarding termination of federal subsidies to student loans providers may not save 87 billion dollars as expected earlier. Instead, it can give a relief of 47 billion dollars according to Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

    After taking into consideration the market risk of switching all federal student loans into the direct lending program, CBO has provided a figure of 33 billion dollars as estimated savings. Also, administrative costs pertaining to the direct loan program would minimize savings by roughly 7 billion dollars.

    CBO calculations besought by Republicans bring forth dilemmas regarding plans of Obama and congressional Democrats. The crux of their questioning is rationale behind spending the projected saving on education programs and deficit minimization. Representative of Minnesota, John Kline believes that taxpayers would be assaulted in a big way as anything suggesting a saving of 87 billion seems wedded to farce.

    Committee Democrats, contrarily, suggested that the Republicans were trying to ambush the books of accounts by beseeching CBO to neglect prevailing market scenario. According to Committee Chairman George Miller, a California Democrat, the Republicans were wary of the idea that the legislation has brought a reprieve of 90 billion dollars to students and taxpayers.

    Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, senior Republican of the Senate Budget Committee, has already urged CBO to recalculate its projection to incorporate market risk cost which includes the potential of student loan default over a period of 10 years. He said that he was extremely happy on knowing that CBO has informed the economic and budgetary consequence of Obama’s plan to congress.

    Obama along with Miller look forward to putting an end to 43-year-old Federal Family Education Loan Program that subsidizes and ensures loans arranged by private lenders. Fresh federal student loans would be coming under the umbrella of 16-year old Direct Loan Program. Miller’s idea, much like Obama, would allow student loan providers to tussle for loan-servicing requirements; namely payment processing and default collection. Going by Miller legislation, 87 billion dollars of the projected saving would be directed into other programs. About 40 billion dollars would be allotted to Pell Grants and 10 billion dollars for grants pertaining to early childhood education. Another 10 billion dollar would be allotted towards deficit reduction.

    Republican lawmaker, Kline feels that taking over the student loan program is nothing but a planned hoopla organized in times of budget to finance the spending spree.

  • Student Loans : Financing College Education In The Future

    Posted on July 27th, 2009 Editor More Than 14 Days

    The market of student loans is undergoing huge changes. Around a year earlier, people found low-cost federal student loans, both private and government, dependable but today, the situation is different. In the past, private companies were paid by taxpayers to provide loan to students; they are reimbursed when the borrowers default. This impels huge amounts of money from taxpayers which lead to the benefits of the lenders without putting them at any risk.

    Barack Obama has top three priorities which are health care, energy and college affordability. Making these things easily accessible will surely enhance the standard of American families and will also make their future secure. Basically, we have two choices: we can either continue channeling amounts paid by taxpayers through the boardrooms or start directing them straight to the dorm rooms.

    After vigorously discussing with the key stake holders, the legislation has been revealed for creating an affordable, reliable and good quality program for federal student loans which will make college education easier for all the Americans. Under this legislation, grant aids will be increased and student loans will be stabilized, thus helping more number of students to graduate without or with fewer debts. Apart from that, taxpayers will not need to pay extra dime for this. Among the changes include:

    1. First of all, Pell Grant will be strengthened which aims at providing financial aid to the low income students. The annual scholarship will be increased $5,500 to $6,900 by the year 2019.
    2. Secondly, the interest rates will be kept down for students from middle class. In the year 2012, the rates of interest on the subsidized federal loans will increase from 3.4% to 6.8%. As per this bill, the interest rates will be variable starting from that year thus, they will be kept affordable.
    3. Thirdly, the legislation will make payments for the investments and cut off all the federal loans for students from the market swings from 2010 through more stable Direct Loan Program. Direct lending will provide same low-cost financial aid as the lenders but at a lower cost plus without the interest related conflicts. The Congressional Budget Office says that this small change will save $90 billion for the tax payers over a decade, thus proving a more efficient, affordable and dependable program for both tax payers and students.
    4. Fourth, customer services will be upgraded for all the borrowers of federal loans. Instead of forcing the private industry to be out of the system, a new private-public partnership will be forged which will maintain jobs as well as provide a higher quality service to the borrowers when they repay their loans. In this way, non-profits and lenders will try to do their best as far as the service loans are concerned. The private sector innovation will be harnessed for the welfare of the general public.
    5. Fifth, the legislation will provide new initiatives proposed by Obama for preparing the students to compete in future jobs. $10 billion will be invested for turning the community colleges into education and job training vessels that will be helpful in the recovery of the economy.
    6. Finally, a sound fiscal future will be built for the students and $10 billion will also be returned for paying down the deficit.

    After all, all the parents want their children to receive best of the education without the need to be heavily indebted. For this, the financial aid system has to be transformed which will aim at the benefits of the students rather than of the banks.

  • Obama’s Student Loan Reform Plan Passed The House Committee On 30-17 Vote

    Posted on July 26th, 2009 Editor More Than 14 Days

    The House Committee has approved the plan of President Barack Obama to eliminate the subsidized loans for students by companies that are led by Sallie Mae. George Miller, representative of the legislation from Democrat which includes President Obama’s plan passed House Education and Labor Committee on 30-17 vote.

    Education Department has been responsible for running competing systems of college loans for 16 years, but now, Miller and Obama seem to end this. The Federal Family Education Loan Program is meant for subsidizing and guaranteeing loans given out by the private lenders for the pass 43 years. Another program which was created in the year 1993 facilitates the government to give out loans to the students directly.

    The plan of Obama and Miller aims at eliminating the guarantee programs and switching all the new federal student loans to direct lending. The plan will be executed from July 2010. Like Obama’s plan, Miller’s proposal will also force the companies to compete among themselves for tasks of loan-servicing like collecting on loan defaults and processing payments. According to the estimates of the Non-partisan office of Congressional Budget, the plan of Obama will save around $87 billion in the period of 10 years. Out of these savings, the legislation from Miller will direct $40 billion for Pell Grant and $10 billion for early-childhood educational grants. $10 billion will also be used to help in reducing the deficit.

    As a consequence of the bill, the wasteful tax payer subsidies will be ended. As per the legislation, its administration proposals will simplify the application procedure of college aid and new grants will be created for early-childhood education and community colleges.

    Sallie Mae from SLM Corp of Virginia is the largest student loans provider in US. Last year, Sallie Mae earned $24.2 billion out of student loans, out of which 74% were federally guaranteed. Sallie Mae recently faced a fall by 2.9% in the New York Stock Exchange Composite trading after its shares profited 6.9% since the beginning of this year.

    Most of the Republicans including Brett Guthrie, a representative from Kentucky, opposed the legislation of Miller, arguing that it will create a monopoly of the government over college loans. As an alternative, Guthrie proposed another bill which will allow the companies to offer federal loan to students which will be sold to the federal government. This measure was rejected by the committee in 30-16 vote.

    Executive Director of America’s Student Loan Providers, Kevin Bruns, said that the legislation passed by the committee will eliminate competition, consumer choice and default prevention programs that private lenders offer. America’s Student Loan Providers is a group from Washington which represents over 80 money lending companies including Student Loan Corp, Nelnet and Sallie Mae.

  • Student Loan Debt - Minnesota Lawyer Not To Be Absolved

    Posted on July 21st, 2009 Editor More Than 14 Days

    While he has amassed perceptible pity from lower courts, a three-judge appeals panel is not going to allow a Minnesota attorney to run away with his student loan debt.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit rallied against a bankruptcy court and a district court and made it mightily clear that Mark Allen Jesperson cannot get a waiver any higher than $ 360000 in student loans debt. The lower court had earlier suggested that the loan repayment would be akin to a gargantuan task that would create unnecessary economic fragility for Jesperson. The three-judge panel claimed that self-created limitations which are a harbinger for only $ 48000 (gross income) can’t be enough excuse for abating debts.

    Jesperson has graduated from Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, Ore., in the year 2000 and has come to garner some $363,218 cumulatively as student loan principal, interest and collection costs. This was at a time when he filed for bankruptcy. He has worked in the capacity of a judicial clerk, a lawyer and lately as a temporary legal worker for Kelly Services, quitting each time stating myriad personal reasons. Jesperson, in his bankruptcy filing, rallied for a debt relief claiming exceptional financial imbalance caused by the loan; it is notable that he hasn’t paid any of his student loans.

    The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota in 2007 is strong in conviction that Jesperson has been fairly smudged with acute lack of discipline and commitment and he has not been co-operative at all in partaking workplace responsibilities. Having said this, the court also put Jesperson on a favorable footing when it suggested that Jesperson doesn’t get anything left in the kitty after fending off child support and additional expenses.

    In the meantime, lenders have nailed Jesperson on the grounds of refusing federal repayment programs. They argued that Jesperson should have a surplus of $900/month if he used the program in which his loan payment would have been only $629/month.

    The appeals panel also did not concur to the steadfastness with which the lower courts have refused hardship analysis in light of federal loan repayment program. The panel claimed that if borrower can find aid in ICRP program and can clear student loan dues while still keeping up with a moderate living standard then lack of fresh start is nowhere close to undue hardship. Also, according to the panel, the lower courts have miscalculated the tax bracket of Jesperson suggesting it to be 33 percent rather than 17.5 percent.

  • Changes In Student Loans, US Bank

    Posted on July 20th, 2009 Editor More Than 14 Days

    US Bank, one of the biggest student loan lenders in the market has announced that it is going to suspend the new subsidized loans during September, the step that will change the way college students receive loans for their academic related requirements. Financial aid offices all over Northern Kentucky and Greater Cincinnati have been told that the US Bank is going to disperse its existing loans under the program of Federal Family Education Loan through the next summer season, which means that the current students do not need to search for new money lenders for now.

    The Fifth Third Bank is one of the top student loan lenders in Cincinnati and it has announced that it will not suspend guaranteed loans itself. While other banks across the country have already taken this step, the US Bank is preparing for eliminating the federal guaranteed loan program. It is part of the plan to convert all the loans into direct federal loans. This is a suggestion by congressional Democrats and President Barack Obama who think that it will save around $100 billion in the next 3 years in guarantees.

    These savings can be invested into new loans, in addition to increasing the amount of the Pell Grant to $5500 in the coming years. It is a federal grant for students with low income. The procedure for Free Application for Federal Student Aid will also be made simple, which has to be filled in by all the students who are applying for financial aid.

    The bill has been introduced by the Democrats to authorize the change. According to the advocates, the all-direct lending system will provide protection to the students of small schools and the program will give the same rate of interest, fees and repayment terms to all the students. Although banks are not in support of the change as they claim that they provide sufficient choices to the students.